|
TGVR
The Global Ventures Review
TGVR
Executive Intelligence · Market Perspective · Operational Insight
| Issue No. 06 · July 2026 |
Luciano Global Ventures Inc. |
|
|
Editor's Note
Welcome to Issue 06.
This one comes from experience I still think about. Back in 2018, I watched one of our companies go public, and with that came a public currency and a mandate: go out, do M&A, become a buyer. What followed was an education in discipline. The accretive deals that compounded, the distracting ones that pulled focus, and the difference between them, which was rarely obvious in the moment.
The lesson that stayed with me was about candor. Align all parties on the exit pathways early, before the first target ever crosses the desk. The deals we were disciplined about protected value. The conversations we avoided, about which targets fit the exit and which did not, quietly left terminal value on the table. That silence carries a cost, and it usually surfaces years later, at the exit itself.
I know it is summer. Whether you are deep in the quarter or stepping away for time with family while the kids are off, I hope this issue earns the read. And I hope it sparks a conversation that may have been overdue in your organization, on either side of the table.
|
Mark Luciano Ainsworth · Managing Partner |
|
|
Feature
Attraction or Accretion
The Conversation to Have Before the Hundred-and-Eighty-Day Thesis Is Written
Every bolt-on is one or the other. Most teams find out which one at exit.
When a company takes private equity money, the mandate quietly flips. For years the team sharpened its own stone: unit economics, service, supply chain. Then the capital arrives, and the job becomes terminal value at a pace the team has never run. In most theses, that means becoming a buyer, and buying is a different discipline entirely. Not a variation on operating. A different discipline.
Deal teams are natural attachers, hunting payload for the rocket. Operators protect the machine, and their fear dresses up as discipline. Both instincts have a failure mode, and value leaks in the silence between them: deals that should not have been done, and deals that should have been done and were not.
The fix starts at the exit, not the target. Name the three or four acquirers who could plausibly buy the platform, the IPO path, the RTO if that is the honest route. Then draw the bingo board: for each buyer, the squares that must be filled for the exit to clear. A bolt-on stops being judged on "is this a good business" and starts being judged on "does this fill a square our buyer needs to see."
From there, every credible deal pulls one of four levers: customers, capability, margin, or scale. Commit them to paper inside the first hundred and eighty days, along with what you walk away from, before anyone is emotionally invested in a target. Then pace the program by what the team can absorb, because nobody sells a smooth, wildly profitable business, and respect that diligence has a ceiling no data room can raise.
The discipline binds both chairs. The deal team gives up volume for precision. The operator gives up the comfortable no. What both get back is an exit that clears at the number the thesis promised. The conversation costs nothing. Skipping it gets priced at exit.
Continue Reading →
|
|
In Brief
|
01
On the Calendar
It's July. Let Them Go to the Beach.
Let's be honest, July and August are dead. Your customers are on holiday, so whose call are you really waiting for? And work-life balance is a folk tale anyway. Nobody splits themselves evenly; either your family gets the short end or your work does. So plan around the truth. When leadership helps people take the time, families included, the friction at home drops and your team comes back laser-focused instead of juggling. A juggling employee gives no one their full self, not you and not the people they love. The back half is where the numbers get made. Send them into it whole.
|
02
Worth Noting
The Fourth Exit Path Nobody Writes on the Bingo Board
PitchBook tracked 38 exits through continuation funds in Q1 2026, roughly $10.8 billion including estimates for undisclosed deals, holding the same pace as a year ago. When the buyer doesn't materialize, the GP becomes the buyer, rolling the asset into a new vehicle to hand LPs liquidity without an actual exit. Some sponsors are now rolling the same asset twice, and LPs have noticed. It's a legitimate release valve, and it's also a tell. Every continuation vehicle is a bingo board that didn't fill. If the honest answer to "who buys this platform" is "we do, again," the thesis conversation is overdue.
|
03
What I'm Reading
The Synergy Solution · Mark Sirower and Jeff Weirens
Two Deloitte M&A leads on why prepared acquirers win and reactive ones pay for it, from strategy through announcement day to the integration grind. It's the book-length version of the conversation in this issue: the discipline is built before the deal, not after. And in keeping with the season, there's an audiobook, so it works just as well poolside or with your feet in the sand as it does at the desk. Consider it homework that doesn't feel like homework.
Get the Book →
|
|
|
“Attraction is easy. Accretion is a discipline.”
|
|
You Should Be Talking About...
Conversations PE, investors, and operators should be having
|
Operations
Global M&A Momentum Builds as Megadeals Surge, but Acquirers Confront a Winner's Paradox
Bain & Company · June 2026
Bain's 2026 M&A Midyear Report puts global deal value at $2.4 trillion through May, up 41% year over year and tracking toward the second-highest annual total on record. The finding that matters most: large deals frequently take 36 months or more from announcement to full integration, and acquirers now face what Bain calls the winner's paradox, delivering an ambitious M&A agenda and an AI transformation simultaneously. Bain's prescription is to treat the integration program itself as the unlocking moment for workflow redesign rather than a separate initiative competing for the same bandwidth.
Thirty-six months is the absorption constraint with a number attached. The deal is signed in a quarter. The digestion takes three years. Any acquisition thesis that does not budget leadership attention on that timeline is a spreadsheet, not a plan.
Read the Full Article →
|
|
Finance
Global M&A Trends in Private Capital: 2026 Mid-Year Outlook
PwC · June 2026
The exit environment remains the binding constraint on PE dealmaking. As of March 2026, private equity globally held 32,979 portfolio companies, essentially flat against year-end 2025, and PwC's read on fundraising is blunt: managers with strong DPI and credible value creation plans will hold the advantage as LPs weight realized returns over unrealized IRR. Resilience, not deal volume, is separating the platforms that keep transacting from the ones facing longer fundraises and aging portfolios.
Nearly 33,000 companies waiting on an exit is the macro version of this issue's argument. When the window is the constraint, the bolt-ons that fill a buyer's squares are the ones that clear it. LPs are grading on DPI now, and DPI is terminal value realized, not modeled.
Read the Full Article →
|
|
|
Leadership
Five Steps to Strengthen M&A Capabilities, No Matter the Starting Point
McKinsey & Company · February 2026
McKinsey's latest survey of nearly 1,000 executives finds that programmatic acquirers, companies doing multiple deals per year, keep widening their edge. They are about twice as likely to source targets before they come to market, 1.8 times as likely to have executives who can articulate the vision for partnership with a target, and 2.5 times as likely to run postmortems after deals close. The sobering counterpoint: even among these practiced buyers, only 13% strongly agree their organizations manage culture with the same rigor as the rest of the integration.
The buying muscle is trained, not assumed. McKinsey's programmatic acquirers are running the hundred-and-eighty-day thesis permanently, and the 13% figure says even the best crews still underestimate the weather.
Read the Full Article →
|
|
Perspective
How AI Companies Are Rewriting M&A
Deloitte · May 2026
Deloitte argues the traditional playbook of drawing a clean perimeter around an asset, running diligence, closing, then integrating no longer applies when the acquisition is people, code, and compute contracts. Three deal archetypes now dominate AI-era transactions, including acquihires that lift out the team while the original company keeps operating. The winners, Deloitte concludes, are not the ones with the best deal terms but the ones that convert access into operational advantage fastest, treating the transaction as an integrated execution challenge rather than a sequential phase-gate process.
This is the capability lever taken to its extreme. When what you bought is a team and its code, there is no floor to walk, but the discipline does not disappear. Someone senior still has to look the acquired capability in the eye before close, and the integration model is still a decision, not a discovery.
Read the Full Article →
|
|
|
By the Numbers
|
80%+
of PE and corporate dealmakers expect greater deal volume and value over the next 12 months than in 2025. Appetite is up.
Deloitte 2026 M&A Trends Survey
|
32,979
portfolio companies sitting on PE books globally as of March, essentially unchanged from year-end. The exit backlog is the constraint.
PwC Jun 2026
|
36 mo
or more for large deals to move from announcement to full integration. The deal closes in a quarter; the digestion takes three years.
Bain Jun 2026
|
13%
of even programmatic acquirers strongly agree they manage culture with the same rigor as the rest of integration. Discipline is rare.
McKinsey Feb 2026
|
|
|
If this was worth your time, forward it to someone who should be reading it. Forward this issue →
|
|